Claudine Ly

International OrganizationAfter the inception of the coupled Nations, the ara viewed the United Nations as the impetus of a virgin spherical mold. Nations enjoins succumbed to serenityful concessions quite than having entirelyowed interstate problems to culminate into a ternary macrocosm war. The United Nations was different from the coalition of Nations in that it reintegrated WWII victors as closely as losers and formed them into a coalition that worked towards orbiculate peace and security.However, as decolonization began to indorse in the 1960s, the increase in the take of sovereign states expanded lickship in the United Nations. As the progenys of genus Phallus nations grew, the United Nations reflected to a greater extent diversified interests. The study(ip) shift in interests was nonably sight in star of the principal organs of the United Nations, the General Assembly. It granted totally member nations the right to unrivaled fitted take and resolut ions could be passed with a two-thirds majority. With this in mind, the United Nations widened its scope to reflect the interests of littler nation states much(prenominal)(prenominal) as in the argonas of economic ontogeny and health.However, small state ambitions keep coincided with the interests of the great power states. For example, countries much(prenominal) as Rwanda or Burkina Faso would fuck off like to form U.N. initiatives to aid their countries sustain fitted development rather than having spent the U.N. budget to ache the U.S. aim to counter the war on terrorism. In addition, because of this growing disparity amidst national interests, the United Nations has not been adapted to adhere to its proposed principles. In fresh years, one has observed one of the greatest human beings rights violators, Libya, elected to chair the Human Rights Commission. some other deplorable undertaking was Syria, a global sustentationer of terrorism, elected to hostage Council.T oday, the realise of UN has suffered greatly collectable to repeated scandals that left the image of a corrupted and non alterive physical com slope, incapable of actualizeing its attributions in the fresh earth ready.UN is facing a refreshing world straddle to which it moldiness adapt in lodge to maintain its moorage and its reference on the world(prenominal) flying field. upstart years crisis have found UN incapable of having a firm and prompt chemical reaction and somehow stuck in the attitudes adopted in its beginnings. UN guarantees unable to rise to the expectations and unable to get in a track type in world politics. Instead of having the means to impose its position in the world, UN is scened tardily with on of its worst periods, when its position on different subjects has no importance or influence.The distribution of power in right aways outside(a) order is dip more and more towards the West, especially towards the yet world power remaining th e US. The transaction betwixt UN and US are more and more deteriorated due to the differences in discernment over the war in Iraq and this dissimilarity in the relation with US had a great cost on UN. However, UN is keep mum seen by Washington as having an big government agency in the planetary arena on both security and addition levels.This is wherefore the US is trying to relegate out solutions for a reform of UN by trying to involve the establishment in the ongoing crisis in the world. The repugn is then even greater with UN having to face a new leadership starting in 2007, and having to face the nuclear crisis in Iran and northeast Korea. Perhaps the only reason why UN is still supported by US is that it is still seen as a worthful forum and tool for advancing U.S. interests on the outside(a) stage (Gardiner, 2007). Despite the shown support for UN reform, there is little trust in US that it might succeed.UN, although seen as a strong governing body that regula tes upon the world order, no longer has the power to enforce its sanctions and regularise in crisis. It is very unlikely that UN leave alone be able to impose its sanctions on Iran or North Korea in what regards the nuclear crisis, so the role of the organization is decent more and more in momentous. This is why the cleft in the midst of the capabilities of UN and its position is getting wider.The or so chief(prenominal) role of UN has been played in the past decenniums in addition actions, as the involvement of UN in third world crisis has gained a very valuable reputation. In contemporary humanitarian crisis UN seems unable to perform its role and intervene in such a serious matter as the genocide in Sudan. Due to this incapability, the role of UN is more and more contested at the international level, as the UN proves to be as incapable of dealing with humanitarian crisis as it was with Rwanda and Bosnia. This is why there is a charter for reform in the UN Human Rights Council (Gardiner, 2007).The challenge that lies ahead of UN by means of the nuclear crisis in Iran and North Korea is going to define the prox of the organization and its role in the international arena. This is why it is so important for UN to restore its position and influence. exactly in order to do so, UN must go through institutional and managerial reforms that will reenforce the organizations role in world politics.In the actual shift in power in the international arena, UNs terminations seem unlikely to have much influence on particular actors. Countries such as Iran or North Korea are very unlikely to be touch too much by the sanctions impose by UN as the power of the organization is rapidly decreasing.There is an increasing opinion that UN is an illegal organization, incapable of facing the current international order and no longer able to impose its position in the international arena. This situation was caused by several scandals and crisis that the organization faced in the past cardinal years (Gardiner, 2007). UNs poor arbitrate in Rwanda, Bosnia, or Sudan, as well as cases of corruption exposed inner the UN have affected the image of the organization greatly, making it unable to stand up for its cause in international crisis. If UN is no longer respected and seen as the clean protector of human rights and of peace, then it cannot perform its role. As UN proved unable or unwilling to stand up for its humanitarian believes in genocides or against dictatorship, its influence and its role decrementd considerably.UNs actions have been intensively critiqued and its believability suffered greatly after 2005, when UNESCO gave the Jos market place International Prize to Venezuelan professorship Hugo Chvez, awarding the Latin American leader for his struggle for liberty (Gardiner, 2007). This award was understandably against the position held by the world powers and it stands as a proof of the prisonbreak created between the formal rules of UN and the international powers.Perhaps the only personal manner in which the UN can save its credibility and perform the role it was created for is by not expanding the membership in the security department Council. In the new international military context, the role of UN can be significant and by paying its cards right the organization has a chance of regaining its prestigious role.In order for UN to continue its work and re-impose itself it must adapt to the new world order it must follow the leadership of US and Western forces. By increasing the number of members in the Security Council, UN would be strained to take stands against the US as the vote will likely be against US on key issues. An enlarged Security Council would be against the US, which would widen the gap between UN and world leadership (Gardiner, 2007).One of the reasons for UNs unfitness to resolve promptly and efficiently to world crisis such as the war in Iraq is that its operational system is far too slow and ineffective. The members of the Security Council have far too different views in order to defecate an efficient agreement in while. This institutional framework of the UN proves to be uneffective in instantlys changing world order. UNs ability to respond in crisis will only decrease in a larger Security Council, since it already faces serious difficulty.If UN wants to reinforce its position in the international arena, it must face some very much indispensable reforms that are intended to shape up the organization and make it reinstate a leading role. But such reforms are very unlikely to be achieved as the influence of opposing members is quite considerable.A significant number of member states, especially those leading the G-77 group of developing countries view the reform of UN as threatening to their influence in the organization and therefore they use all their power to prevent the reform of UN. specially this kind of influence that some member states have upon t he UN decision making process is the kind of influence that is widening the gap between the actual world powers and UN (Schaefer, 2006).In order for UN to actively participate in international relations, it must reform its institutional framework. But in order for UN to reform, it must have the vote of several countries that are against rehabilitation and strengthening the role of the West. This vicious clan is the one that is stopping UN from evolving and adapting.The influence of todays great powers in the UN decision making process is low and this is one of the reasons why UN is losing its legitimacy. Instead of being an important actor in security matters, the institutional framework of UN makes it impossible for the organization to reach a consensus in an effective time framework, leading the organization not meddlesome or not taking a strong enough position in important issues.Todays international actors seem to ignore the UN and seem to take decisions no matter the positi on of UN particularly because the influence of UN has lessen severely in the past decade or so. More and more voices see the UN as a future tribulation that will follow its predecessor, the League of Nations.In recent years, the role of UN is more and more challenged and its decisions have less and less impact in the international arena. Designed to fire peace and worldwide security, the UN proves to be a visitation 62 years later due to its incapability to evolve and develop in time. UNs incapability to adapt to the new world order and its inability to promote its goals makes the organization seem dysfunctional and illegitimate. The major change that is needed for the future of UN lays in its ability to face the challenges of today and to aggressively take action in the matters concerning todays threats.Bibliography1.Gardiner, Nile, The Decline and Fall of the United Nations Why the U.N. Has Failed and How It Can Be Reformed, February 7, 2007, operational at http//www.heritag e.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/hl991.cfm