Existentialism & Fight Club Essay

?From an existentialism point of view, there is no right or wrong choice, since integrity gives an perfor publicce value by the fair play of choosing it. Choices dejection only be judged on how involved the decision workr is when qualification it. Judging by this affirmard, the trust clerk is justify in killing Tyler, since he full became involved in choosing to both comport and jib Tylers value by that formion. Existentialisms source relocation is to make every man certified of what he is and to make the full accountability of his human macrocosms rest on him. In my essay, I sh both first reason how hit Tyler is crucial in allowing the teller to win the first move in encom chief existentialism. He acts as the catalyst for the vote counter to make the first move in existentialism cosmos awargon of what he is by ac do itledging all his primal instincts and fasten on debt instrument for his population. Tyler does so through with(predicate) with(predicate ) his acts of escalating furiousness and atrocity to provoke the narrator to await both who he is and his responsibilities, culminating finally in his avouch finale.I shall withal discuss the topic of bolt downrism as portrayed in the movie, and how the decision of shoot Tyler relates to the narrators interpretation of this theme. The narrator had been hesitant to hold full responsibility for his humankind at the start of the movie. He dislikes his present circumstances- he is jaded with his current job and lacks a clear purpose, as illustrated by the inverted comma A single serving package, a single serving Once he consumes the single serving, he is done. He makes a fleeting impression in individual elses life before he fades from their memory.He feels his domain is meaningless because he has no connections with anyone. He is not guinea pig with the present pass on he is in, further makes no active effort to consciously int leftover his own existence. He shows rubb er faith in this respect, because he deceives himself into conceptualize that he lacks complete license of enfolding in making this decision. He is a coward by Sartres definition Those who plow their complete freedom from themselves push through of a spirit of seriousness or by fashion of deterministic excuses. He possesses the thirst to re desex his existence by rebelling against the values in society, but this conflicts with his conscious object (the ego), which restraints him from doing anything socially unsufferable. His conscious mind hides these unaccep table desires in the subconscious mind, coming up with excuses that prevent the narrator from fulfilling these desires. Eventually, the repressed life pressure from these unconscious desires resulted in the fracturing of the ego itself- into devil conscious minds, hence resulting in the expression of Tyler.Tyler represents everything that the narrator subconsciously wishes to be. He is the incarnation of the ID its elf, representing the narrators repressed remnant instincts (our innate instinct for survival), aggression instincts (instincts for violence), and the libido. beforehand he meets Tyler, the narrator is shapes his existence though article of piece of furniture he purchases and assembles from IKEA. He attempts to make himself into a existence-in-itself, believing his perfect state of existence can be reached by purchasing that last piece of furniture he require.When the narrators tin was bombed, annihilating the means by which he defines his existence, the narrator felt as though his existence itself was erased. Every stick of furniture in there was my life. Tyler teaches him not to verify on material goods but to define his existence by his actions. The fight confederacy olibanum became the new means through which the narrator could define himself through acts of fighting. The narrator learns to revel in violence and tangible annoyancefulness as a means of defining his existence and to transcend the natural limits of the body.He get hold ofs the first criterion of self- sureness by satisfying his primal instincts for aggression. His first epiphany occurs when he materializes Tyler is himself. In a sense, he recognize that he (as Tyler) is free and capable of inventing and creating himself as whom he chooses to be. This is an alpha step because he now wants to assume responsibility for his existence. His plump for epiphany occurs when he shoots Tyler, and thus himself. On the first level, the narrator acknowledges his death instincts by confronting his caution of pain and death.He accepts Tylers ideas of experiencing death so as to be to the full conscious of his physical existence. When he shoots Tyler, he does so with the awareness that he is shaft himself. This is the final step he needs to take in order to be fully aware of what he is. On the second level, by averting Tylers nihilistic ideas of destroying institutions and value syste ms, he chooses what values to stand for and thus renders his own purpose for himself. In choosing his ethics, composition makes himself. He also translates the touch sensation in these values into the actual action of shooting Tyler, thus defining his existence through actual action.On the third level, by shooting Tyler, he assumes responsibility for all of reality, not just himself. He assumes responsibility for Man because he invents what Man should be one who does not act in an uncaring and annihilative way of life towards opposites. On the fourth level, shooting Tyler allows the narrator to be define in a way he wishes to be defined in the eyes of the other. guessing Tyler is crucial towards removing the existence of Project Mayhem. He does not want Marla to find forbidden about Project Mayhem because he will then put up his connections with her.It is important to the narrator to have a slopped relationship with Marla. Firstly, she is the only surviving real human b eing he has a close relationship with in the movie. Secondly, Marla, vie the role of the other, allows him to feelk out knowledge about his existence and she is the considerateness for his existence. By shooting Tyler, he prevents the button of this other that is crucial for his existence. Important themes discussed in the movie include consumerism. To be specific, it shows how the redbrick consumerist society affects Mans aim of his existence.In Sartres words, how a diversity in the a priori limits which outline mans funda cordial situation in the universe affects Mans stopping point of his existence with respect to these limits. harmonize to Sartre, all configurations either appear as attempts to pass beyond them or recede from them or deny them or adapt to them. Consumerism imposes limits on Man to work and to consume, because only if Man works can he consume, and he can consume only if he works. He is emasculated because he is unavailing to fulfill his natural role as a hunter-collector as dictated to him by biology.Man is limited or restrict in the sense he is unable to fulfill his primitive instincts. As seen in the movie, Tyler tries to pass beyond these limits by destroying symbols of consumerism, such as credit card companies, so as to return to Ground secret code. Since some(prenominal) muckle define their existence by numbers in their bank accounts, destroying the bank records will erase their previous existence and allow them to create their existence anew, much like how the narrators apartment was bombed so that he could create his new existence through difference Club.Tylers ultimate object seems to be changing the limits by which people define their existence by. He envisions the destruction of recent civilization, and a regression back to a more primitive hunter gatherer state. In the conception I see you are stalking elk through the same canyon forests around the ruins of rock feller Centre. In the world he envisions, the new limits by which people will define themselves with respect to are undoubtedly physical strength and prowess. On the other hand, the narrator, like so many of us today, adapts to these limits by embracing consumerism as indoctrinated into him by society through advertisements.He avidly purchases IKEA furniture and defines his existence by these material goods. In Tylers words, he works jobs he hates so he can buy shit he doesnt need. He assumes that his furniture unequivocally defines him as a mortal, from the glass wheel with imperfections made by the simple and trusty people of wherever to his yin-yang coffee table, while missing the irony that IKEA is a chain-store that mass produces furniture. He is no other different from many other consumers of IKEA who believe that their furniture is unique on virtuousness of it being selected by them.At the end of the movie, the narrator realizes he needs to rap a balance between the 2 opposing configurations, one that is in the pre -consciousness state, alarmed to confront his freedom, and the other that embraces existentialism and freedom to the point of reckless destruction. Shooting Tyler thus allows him to reunite his opposing configurations and strike a middle balance. Marla is an example of how a person recedes from limits that outline the human sort out. She does not know what values to choose to define her existence.As a result, she adopts a nihilistic posture and attempts to hit rock-bottom by assay to court death. Lastly, another important theme in the movie is that of mental pain. more characters in the movie experience mental pain because they are unable to reject the being in itself others force upon them. Thus, they cannot get to a true state of being for itself This is because we perceive others as a condition of our own existence, as how Sartre puts it. According to Sartre, once we realize we exist, we realize the existence of others who are free to define us according to how they view us. We are objectified in the eyes of others because others view us as a being in itself. We lose our freedom through their perception of us. plainly we looking back and viewing others as objects can we regain our freedom. Bob is viewed as a man who has lost his masculinity. He accepts this being in itself, believing that he is condemned to this fixed and unchanging physical body. Thus, he suffers mental pain because he does not reject the attempts of being in itself others force upon him by realizing his freedom to create his own existence.The narrator similarly suffers from accepting the being in itself society forces upon him- as a member of society whose purpose is to work, to consume and to obey his superiors. His ideal self-image is that of a wet and ruthless primal human being. However, he dares not embrace his freedom to reject this being for itself and work towards the transcendent culture of his ideal self-image. Thus, his mental pain caused Tyler to manifest, who violently abuses the narrator to symbolize the mental pain the narrator is experiencing.Tyler tries to push the narrator to be fully aware of his unconscious desires, and to assume responsibility for his freedom. Only when he confronts this mental pain (Tylers physical abuse) can he reject being for itself and achieve true being-for-itself, the state where he is evermore and freely choosing his future. His decision to shoot Tyler was justified-because he is freely choosing to reject Tylers destructive ideas, and to transcend his initial transcendent goal of becoming Tyler.In conclusion, the movie has substantial themes of existentialism running through it. The act of shooting Tyler was justified because it signifies the first step of existentialism for the narrator- he becomes fully aware of what he is, and assumes full responsibility of his existence. It also shows how human beings may choose to define themselves with respect to the limits of the world they exist in. Lastly, shooting Tyle r allows the narrator to confront his mental pain and reach the true state of being for itself.