Case Study No. 2

Human Resource Management - Case StudyWhat is the paradoxThe main puzzle here is the lamentable intercourse and coordination body mingled with the 26 divisional offices the region . The regional offices operate on their earn without being in touch with the other(a) regions within the a corresponding(p) fundamental law . Each of the 26 regional offices viewed itself as independent , non re exclusivelyy a part of the regional bowel attempt . There was also wretched marketing and selling of the exculpate products despite the fact that the southern region has so legion(predicate) farmers who could retard been the potential customers of their productsWhat caused the problemsThe problem could receive been caused by the followingPoor trail and coordination system among the region offices -The regions were too many for one psyche to brood them . Though they felt autonomous , they were not hale managed . The regional representatives felt that there was no need of consulting other regions they what they were sibylline to do even though they were under the akin geological formation and marketing the same products . They boast taken management and forgot virtuall(a)y leadinghiphip . The differences between leadershiphip and management argon (i ) the manager forever and a day acts as administrators opus leaders be al shipway innovating ways of solving conflicts (ii ) Managers always follow the letter of the law by asking how and why and when objet dart the leaders always are looking for what and why (iii ) organizations managers focus on the system that is solidifying while leaders focus on people (iv ) leading will always do the sort out things while managers will equivalent accuracy and they like doing things indemnify (v ) leadership can nature something and develop it into something big while managers honor status ! quo (vi ) Managers do not turn tail creative mentation . They keep photocopies of the past while leaders will have originality and creativity ( vii leaders are always on their own without emulating any character while managers always bring around to known characters especially those with classic good behavior .

This factor that managers are people who emulate others through imitation without originality (viii ) Managers always rely on control and management while leaders base their egos on trust (ix Leaders always like team add and groups while managers like dealing with individuals (x ) Leaders have long run vision un like managers whose position is shorter and how to satisfy specific goals (xi ) Leaders always will have their vision on the horizonb )Poor confabulation system among the regional officesCommunication was poor from the leadership , to the regional offices and to the farmers . The regional offices felt that they were companies of their own , did their work alone , with little discourse between the regions and headquarters as there was no clear laid down parley system . This greatly affected the business though they mummy felt that their performance was at its best and improving all the timeThe failures in communication arise because of certain blockages or barriers between the sender and the receiver . In to make a communication effective , it must be ensured that the barriers are removed . Since...If you inadequacy to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper