'Macbeth and Animal Farm Essay\r'

'both Shakespeargon and Orwell present rivals as threats to their leaders’ power. Shakespeare introduces this threat through the Witches in Act 1, picture show 3 when the third witch announces that Banquo ‘sh all(prenominal) get kings’. In Macbeth’s soliloquy in Act 3, scene 2, the listening is reminded that he is predisposed with take noteing his power, now that he has become king, and illustrates that Banquo was announced as a ‘father to a line of kings’. The interview assumes that Macbeth is infertile as he feels he is unable to produce an heir as he expresses his ‘ egotistical crown’ and his ‘barren sceptre’ and seems quite shadowed that Banquo’s will profit from ‘the gracious Dun displace’ that he has murdered. It appears that Shakespeare is justifying Macbeth’s ruthless ambition and want to maintain power, which puts Macbeth into darker depths by having Banquo and Fleance murdere d, by his lack of an heir.\r\nSimilarly, the audience is provided by Snowball as the rival to cat sleep’s absolute power in his introduction to the credit in Chapter 2. Orwell tells the reader he ‘was a much vivacious pig than Napoleon’, setting him up immediately in competition His description goes on to describe him as ‘quicker in mother tongue and more inventive ‘. This is proven when he emerges afterward in Chapter 4 as the brave supporter of the Battle of the Cowshed after which we see him awarded with the military machine decoration of ‘Animal Hero First syllabus’ while the reader realizes Napoleon seems to be outstanding in his absence. Moreover, Snowball invents plans for the windmill and Orwell outlines all his creative ideas in his committees and therefore Napoleon clearly makes plans to eat up him from the farm.\r\nThe key difference among Shakespeare and Orwell’s presentations is that we feel Macbethâ€℠¢s thought processes and plans while Orwell keeps the reader in the dark yet offers them clues that Napoleon is not to be trusted. It comes as no surprise to the reader in Chapter 5 when Napoleon unleashes his personally educated dogs, who set up Stalin’s secret police, on Snowball. Both leaders maintain power by eradicating any competition.\r\nhttp://www.enotes.com/homework-help/compare-contrast-impact-conflict-napoleon-macbeth-372660 http://www.gradesaver.com/animal-farm/q-and-a/explore-the-ways-george-orwell-and-william-shakespeare-present-conflict-in-animal-farm-macbeth-51453/ http://prezi.com/f41ewhbheqdv/animal-farm-vs-macbeth/\r\nComparisons amid characters:\r\nLady Macbeth, Macbeth and Napoleon all use others to make headway themselves. Lady Macbeth takes advantage over Macbeth by persuading him to land Duncan so she can have more power. Napoleon uses Squealer to take advantage of the other animals by making them their slaves and being do to believe all Napoleonà ¢â‚¬â„¢s decisions are best for the farm. Both Napoleon and Macbeth become power hungry which turns into a negative effect, both use violence to strive power by installing fear into passel Macbeth’s hunger for power causes him to murder legion(predicate) innocent people and eventually leads to him downfall. Napoleon’s hunger for power causes him to use excessive draw off and make the animals do slave labor. -both Napoleon and Macbeth catch up with Stalin\r\nDifferences:\r\nOne is a play, one is a brisk\r\nM written in 1606 when James 1 was in power in England (birth of the Stuart regime) AF was published in August 1945 after the Russian Revolution of 1917 + predicted the rimed War.\r\nThroughout both ‘Macbeth’ and ‘Animal Farm’ the audience can see a large pith of deceit, treachery and a lack of trust between the leaders’ and their followers. Shakespeare shows this deceit in Macbeth’s descent with other characters where he hides his authoritative feelings and ‘is here in double trust’. However, the audience is privy to the true thoughts of Macbeth and his wife due to their plotting in Act 1, scene 5 where Lady Macbeth tells Macbeth to ‘look like th’innocent flower/ But be the snake under’t’ and which creates dramatic banter during the play. Similarly, Orwell’s novella ‘Animal Farm’ uses dramatic irony as the audience can see that the pigs are manipulating the animals into slave labor and although the audience is not made privy to Napoleon’s innermost thoughts, we can still see past the animals’ lack of countersign to see the pigs are re-writing the 7 Commandments.\r\n'